Trademark
- AMS Survey Cited as Basis for Precedential TTAB Dilution Claim Decision
- Judge rules for Plaintiff in bakery trademark matter
- Distinctiveness at issue in trademark case
- Survey leads to withdrawal of trademark registration application
- Survey showing secondary meaning leads to license agreement
- Insurance company survey blocks use of name by brokerage agency
- Summary judgment for search engine provider driven by survey rebuttal critique
- Survey supports baseball team claims
- Athletic shoe manufacturer uses survey data to prevail against retailer
- Dental supplier defends trade dress by critiquing Plaintiff survey
- Survey shows toy packaging causes confusion
- Survey leads to settlement in arcade game case
Deceptive Advertising
- Survey showing lack of deception in office product advertising
- Survey evaluates impact of deceptive ad claims on consumer perceptions
- Judge cites survey in denying class certification in food additive case
- Survey results block preliminary injunction in bank slogan case
- State AG uses survey to establish unfair practices in telecom case
Class Certification
- Proxy group surveyed in automobile rental class action case
- Survey results defeat class certification in matter alleging carcinogenic effects
- Judge cites survey showing no reliance in denying class certification
- Class certification defeated based on survey of homeowners
Patent Infringement
A federal jury in Marshall, Texas awarded our client, a manufacturer of a consumer electronics product, over $70 million in its patent infringement suit against a leading competitor. AMS served as consultants to our client’s team of attorneys, and conducted market research and analysis to support the damages claim. To perform this analysis, AMS used conjoint analysis, a survey technique in which consumers are asked to trade off various product options they could consider in the buying situation. Conjoint analysis assigns specific dollar values to the range of options in order to indicate the price consumers would pay for a product having the specific infringing feature (or the price concession needed to compensate for the lack of the infringing feature.)
- Survey helps value specific feature of software product
- Drug patents battle relies on survey data
- Infringing feature of software product valued using survey
- Survey rebuttals aid defendant in drug dispensing case
Antitrust/Market Analysis
- Major software company relies on survey to define market in antitrust case
- Survey measuring impact of rumors on sales helps client win $19 million judgment
- Survey helps auto manufacturer properly forecast sales
- Real estate market analysis relies on survey data
Send inquiries to litigation@ams-inc.com
